Logo image
A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot

Abigail R. Wills, Deo D. Shirima, Olivier Villemaire-Côté, Philip J. Platts, Sarah J. Knight, Robin Loveridge, Hamidu Seki, Catherine E. Waite, Pantaleo K. T. Munishi, Herman Lyatuu, …
Royal Society of London. Philosophical Transactions B. Biological Sciences, Vol.378(1867), pp.1-13
2023
PMCID: PMC9662286
PMID: 36374130
pdf
A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot1.73 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
pdf
wills-et-al-2022-correction-to-a-practice-led-assessment-of-landscape-restoration-potential-in-a-biodiversity-hotspot205.03 kBDownloadView
Correction Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0070View
Published Version
url
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0472View
Correction

Abstract

Above-Ground Biomass Assisted Natural Regeneration Biodiversity Conservation Climate Change Mitigation Forest Landscape Restoration Part Ii: Restoration Planning And Evaluation Tree-Planting
Effective restoration planning tools are needed to mitigate global carbon and biodiversity crises. Published spatial assessments of restoration potential are often at large scales or coarse resolutions inappropriate for local action. Using a Tanzanian case study, we introduce a systematic approach to inform landscape restoration planning, estimating spatial variation in cost-effectiveness, based on restoration method, logistics, biomass modelling and uncertainty mapping. We found potential for biomass recovery across 77.7% of a 53 000 km2 region, but with some natural spatial discontinuity in moist forest biomass, that was previously assigned to human causes. Most areas with biomass deficit (80.5%) were restorable through passive or assisted natural regeneration. However, cumulative biomass gains from planting outweighed initially high implementation costs meaning that, where applicable, this method yielded greater long-term returns on investment. Accounting for ecological, funding and other uncertainty, the top 25% consistently cost-effective sites were within protected areas and/or moderately degraded moist forest and savanna. Agro-ecological mosaics had high biomass deficit but little cost-effective restoration potential. Socio-economic research will be needed to inform action towards environmental and human development goals in these areas. Our results highlight value in long-term landscape restoration investments and separate treatment of savannas and forests. Furthermore, they contradict previously asserted low restoration potential in East Africa, emphasizing the importance of our regional approach for identifying restoration opportunities across the tropics. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.

Details

Metrics

24 File views/ downloads
52 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Biology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#1 No Poverty
#2 Zero Hunger
#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image