Logo image
A metric-based framework for climate-smart conservation planning
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A metric-based framework for climate-smart conservation planning

Kristine Camille V Buenafe, Daniel C Dunn, Jason D Everett, Isaac Brito-Morales, David Schoeman, Jeffrey O Hanson, Alvise Dabalà, Sandra Neubert, Stefano Cannicci, Kristin Kaschner, …
Ecological Applications, Vol.33(4), pp.1-29
2023
PMID: 36946332
pdf
A metric-based framework for climate-smart conservation planning38.60 MBDownloadView
Accepted Version Open Access CC BY-NC V4.0
pdf
Ecological Applications - 2023 - Buenafe - A metric‐based framework for climate‐smart conservation planning7.65 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2852View
Published Version

Abstract

MPAs systematic conservation planning spatial prioritization Marxan climate resilience prioritizr environmental decision making
Climate change is already having profound effects on biodiversity, but climate change adaptation has yet to be fully incorporated into area based management tools used to conserve biodiversity, such as protected areas. One main obstacle is the lack of consensus regarding how impacts of climate change can be included in spatial conservation plans. We propose a climate smart framework that prioritizes the protection of climate refugia areas of low climate exposure and high biodiversity retention using climate metrics. We explore four aspects of climate smart conservation planning: i) climate model ensembles; ii) multiple emission scenarios; iii) climate metrics; and iv) approaches to identifying climate refugia. We illustrate this framework in the Western Pacific Ocean, but it is equally applicable to terrestrial systems. We found that all aspects of climate smart conservation planning considered affected the configuration of spatial plans. The choice of climate metrics and approaches to identifying refugia have large effects in the resulting climate smart spatial plans, whereas the choice of climate models and emission scenarios have smaller effects. As the configuration of spatial plans depended on climate metrics used, a spatial plan based on a single measure of climate change (e.g., warming) will not necessarily be robust against other measures of climate change (e.g., ocean acidification). We therefore recommend using climate metrics most relevant for the biodiversity and region considered based on a single or multiple climate drivers. To include the uncertainty associated with different climate futures, we recommend using multiple climate models (i.e., an ensemble) and emission scenarios. Finally, we show that the approaches we used to identify climate refugia feature trade offs between: i) the degree to which they are climate-smart; and ii) their efficiency in meeting conservation targets. Hence, the choice of approach will depend on the relative value that stakeholders place on climate adaptation. By using this framework, protected areas can be designed with improved longevity and thus safeguard biodiversity against current and future climate change. We hope that the proposed climate smart framework helps transition conservation planning towards climate smart approaches.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Ecology
Environmental Sciences

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image