Logo image
A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer

S K Chambers, X Meng, Philippa H Youl, J Aitken, Jeffrey Dunn and P Baade
Quality of Life Research, Vol.21(9), pp.1551-1564
2012
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0067-5View
Published Version

Abstract

Public Health and Health Services colorectal cancer quality of life psychological distress response shift
Purpose: Long-term (≥5 years) quality of life after colorectal cancer is not well described. The present study assessed quality of life (QOL) and psychological distress in colorectal cancer survivors more than 5 years to describe changes over time and antecedents of long-term outcomes. Method: A prospective survey of a population-based sample of 763 colorectal cancer patients assessed socio-demographic variables, health behaviors, optimism, threat appraisal, and perceived social upport at 5 months post-diagnosis as predictors of QOL and psychological distress 5 years post-diagnosis. Results: QOL improved over time (P < 0.01 for each measure); however, measures of psychological distress remained stable (P > 0.07 for each measure). Risk factors for poorer QOL and/or greater psychological distress included: later stage disease, having a permanent stoma, rectal cancer, fatigue, smoking, being single, low social support, low optimism, and a more negative cancer threat appraisal. eing women, having a pet, having a private health insurance, and receiving both surgery and adjuvant treatment were protective. Conclusion: Consistent with response shift theory, the antecedents of QOL after colorectal cancer are multifactorial and include predisposing socio-demographic, medical, and psychological variables. Psychosocial interventions that target both social support and threat appraisal may be effective for this patient group. Additional stepped-up support may be needed for people from a poorer social environment who have multiple risk factors for poorer adjustment. Health system effects require further investigation.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image