Journal article
A comparison study of three physical activity measurement tools examining acceptability in people with psychosis
Australasian Psychiatry, Vol.28(2), pp.175-179
2020
PMID: 31637964
Abstract
Objective: To compare the acceptability of three distinct physical activity measurement tools in people with psychosis: an objective measurement tool, a self-report measure, and an exercise capacity test. Methods: We measured the completion rate for each measurement tool. Participants rated the ease/difficulty of each measure using a 7-point Likert scale. Participants were also asked to rank the three tools in order of the ease of use. Results: Sixty-six per cent (46/69) of participants completed all three assessment tools, and 60.9% (42/69) completed the acceptability questionnaire. The majority of the participants found it easy to complete all three measurement tools. The majority (52.8%) of the participants ranked the objective measurement tool as the easiest to use. Conclusion: All three measures were acceptable to people with psychosis, but objective measurement tools may be easier to use.
Details
- Title
- A comparison study of three physical activity measurement tools examining acceptability in people with psychosis
- Authors
- Shuichi Suetani (Corresponding Author) - Park Centre for Mental HealthJustin Chapman - Metro South HealthNicole Korman - Metro South HealthCarly Chapman - QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteCassandra Dodd (Author) - Metro South HealthFrances Dark - Metro South HealthStephen Parker - University of QueenslandDan Siskind - Park Centre for Mental Health
- Publication details
- Australasian Psychiatry, Vol.28(2), pp.175-179
- Publisher
- Sage Publications Ltd.
- Date published
- 2020
- DOI
- 10.1177/1039856219881957
- ISSN
- 1440-1665
- PMID
- 31637964
- Grant note
- Shuichi Suetani was supported by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists New Investigator Grant, the Society of Mental Health Research Early Career Researcher Project Grant and Avant Doctor in Training Research Scholarship Grant to conduct this study. Dan Siskind is supported in part by an NHMRC ECF APP1111136.
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 991113045802621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
6 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Psychiatry
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites