Logo image
A Cluster-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Impact Evaluation of a Pragmatic Implementation Process for Improving the Cultural Responsiveness of Non-Aboriginal Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services: A Pilot Study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A Cluster-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Impact Evaluation of a Pragmatic Implementation Process for Improving the Cultural Responsiveness of Non-Aboriginal Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services: A Pilot Study

Sara Farnbach, Alexandra Henderson, Julaine Allan, Raechel Wallace and Anthony Shakeshaft
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol.20(5), pp.1-15
2023
PMID: 36901233
pdf
ijerph-20-04223-v2595.81 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054223View
Published Version Open CC BY V4.0

Abstract

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander alcohol and other drugs audit co-design cultural responsiveness implementation service delivery
There is limited evidence regarding implementing organisational improvements in the cultural responsiveness of non-Aboriginal services. Using a pragmatic implementation process to promote organisational change around cultural responsiveness, we aimed to (i) identify its impact on the cultural responsiveness of participating services; (ii) identify areas with the most improvement; and (iii) present a program logic to guide cultural responsiveness. A best-evidence guideline for culturally responsive service delivery in non-Aboriginal Alcohol and other Drug (AoD) treatment services was co-designed. Services were grouped geographically and randomised to start dates using a stepped wedge design, then baseline audits were completed (operationalization of the guideline). After receiving feedback, the services attended guideline implementation workshops and selected three key action areas; they then completed follow-up audits. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test was used to analyse differences between baseline and follow-up audits on three key action areas and all other action areas. Improvements occurred across guideline themes, with significant increases between median baseline and follow-up audit scores on three key action areas (median increase = 2.0; Interquartile Range (IQR) = 1.0–3.0) and all other action areas (median increase = 7.5; IQR = 5.0–11.0). All services completing the implementation process had increased audit scores, reflecting improved cultural responsiveness. The implementation process appeared to be feasible for improving culturally responsive practice in AoD services and may be applicable elsewhere.

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image