Introduction/ Rationale: Utilising Indigenous and non-Indigenous research methodologies side by side offers potentially complementary approaches to understanding occupational performance across cultural contexts. Little research has been conducted into how such cross-cultural methodological companionship can support research delivery and outputs in occupational therapy and beyond.
Objectives: This research explores how Indigenous and non-Indigenous methodologies can support occupational therapy research by consolidating reflections across three independently-conducted and ethically-approved studies
Methods / Approach: All studies utilised Yarning, an Indigenous research approach that supports qualitative insights in keeping with Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. Yarning involves responsive discussion and collaborative opportunities to address research questions. Cross-cultural data analysis methods, inclusive of Thought Ritual and Reflexive Thematic Analysis will be presented.
Results / Practice Implications: Cross-cultural methodology adoption presented both opportunities and challenges for the diverse research teams. Key differences in Yarning sessions, in comparison with focus group methodologies, are critical for ensuring successful implementation. Approaches that are linear, sequential, time driven and distinct, such as Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis, along with journal submission requirements are frequently at odds with Indigenous approaches related to sharing of and analysing knowledges.
Conclusion / Contribution to the occupational therapy profession:
Occupational therapists should employ a critically reflexive detail-focused approach to methodological planning in research that involves utilising Indigenous and non-Indigenous team members and/or participants. Care is required in relation to acknowledging Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing, and the ongoing influence of colonisation on the structures in which research takes place.