Logo image
Evaluating design hypotheses for rail level crossings: An observational study of pedestrian and cyclist behavior
Conference paper   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evaluating design hypotheses for rail level crossings: An observational study of pedestrian and cyclist behavior

Gemma J M Read, Paul M Salmon, M Lenne and Elizabeth Grey
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation Part 1, pp.512-526
Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) International Conference, 5th (Krakow, Poland, 19-Jul-2014–23-Jul-2014)
AHFE Conference
2014
pdf
PDF - Published Version579.18 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
http://ahfe.orgView
Webpage

Abstract

Psychology Design Practice and Management Transportation and Freight Services rail crossings pedestrian safety affordances design evaluation behavioural observation
Accidents involving pedestrians at rail level crossings are a significant public safety concern in Australia and internationally. The current design of rail crossings incorporates assumptions and hypotheses about how people will interact with the infrastructure at the crossing. The hypotheses associated with the design of pedestrian rail crossings in metropolitan Melbourne were evaluated through the findings of naturalistic observations of users. Comparison of actual behavior as recorded in the observations was compared to the design hypotheses relating to the features at the crossing. While for some the majority of behavior was in line with the hypothesis, it was found that a number of the hypotheses were not always supported. The evaluation uncovered unexpected interactions between users and the infrastructure, as well as implications for rail crossing design. The findings support the need for a systems approach to the analysis and design of rail crossings from a pedestrian and cyclist safety perspective to assist understanding of the system and to inform its re-design.

Details

Metrics

111 File views/ downloads
741 Record Views
Logo image