Logo image
Bridging the Research-Practice Gap: Validity of a Software Tool Designed to Support Systemic Accident Analysis by Risk Managers
Conference paper   Peer reviewed

Bridging the Research-Practice Gap: Validity of a Software Tool Designed to Support Systemic Accident Analysis by Risk Managers

Natassia Goode, Paul M Salmon, Natalie Taylor, Michael G Lenne and Caroline F Finch
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.215-225
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International), 17th (Los Angeles, United States, 02-Aug-2015–07-Aug-2015)
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 9174, Springer International Publishing
2015
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_20View
Published Version

Abstract

systems thinking accident analysis research translation
Despite the proposed advantages of systems accident analysis (SAA) methods for understanding incident-causation, these approaches have not been widely adopted by practitioners. This represents a significant gap between research and practice in accident analysis. The Understanding and Preventing Led Outdoor Accidents Data System (UPLOADS) provides a series of tools to address this gap. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of UPLOADS by comparing analyses generated by risk managers and researchers experienced in SAA. Twenty-three risk managers used UPLOADS to collect and analyse incident data from their organization over a three month period. The reports were then analyzed by two researchers experienced in SAA, and compared to those generated by participants. Participants identified half the number of factors identified by researchers, and tended to focus on only one or two factors as the causes of each incident. The potential consequences for practitioners' understanding of incident-causation and countermeasure development are discussed, as well as ways of improving the system.

Details

Metrics

34 File views/ downloads
1000 Record Views
Logo image