The neoliberal agenda in higher education has led to expectations and targets of market-likeness in student enrolment and completion demographics through the widening participation agenda. However, the reality is that disadvantaged groups such as students with a disability and Indigenous students are still underrepresented, particularly in advanced research degrees. This disadvantage is compounded by the temporal disciplining imposed by bureaucratically-defined completion deadlines. Taking Australia as a paradigmatic case, this chapter explores the temporal disciplining of doctoral research in the broader context of neoTaylorism and the projectification of research. It argues that a care-inspired slowness is needed to counterbalance the harms created by the managerialist push for ‘timely’ completion.
Details
Title
The Temporal Disciplining of Doctoral Research in the Neoliberal Academy: Winners and Losers in the Timely Completion
Authors
Deanna Grant-Smith - Queensland University of Technology
Abbe Winter (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Contributors
Theresa Neimann (Editor) - Oregon Coast Community College
Jonathan J Felix (Editor) - Universiti Brunei Darussalam
Elena Shliakhovchuk (Editor) - Polytechnic University of Valencia
Lynne L Hindman (Editor) - Ohio State University Hospital
Publication details
Policy and Practice Challenges for Equality in Education, pp.238-258