Logo image
Social Work, Human Services and Basic Income
Book chapter   Peer reviewed

Social Work, Human Services and Basic Income

Phillip Ablett, Christine Morley and Michelle Newcomb
Implementing a Basic Income in Australia: Pathways Forward, pp.215-235
Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, Palgrave Macmillan
2019
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14378-7_12View
Published Version

Abstract

Social Work economic inequality critical social work human services basic income practitioner activism professional advocacy
Economic inequality is increasing globally and in Australia. Social work and human services (SWHS) professions will be part of the response to the social consequences of this division. However, SWHS have always been contested professions, split between individualist and structural approaches to combatting the social harms of economic inequality. The recent renewal of "critical social work" raises the prospects for a more structural, reform-oriented response from SWHS practitioners to rising inequality. From a critical SWHS perspective, a basic income (BI) could provide a useful response to structural inequality, provided it is part of a redistributive policy suite and not simply a cost-saving replacement for other welfare measures. We argue, based on past and current examples, that critical SWHS could be supportive allies in campaigning for an equitable and adequate BI. This chapter highlights the potential contribution that critical SWHS workers could make in promoting the BI campaign through practitioner activism, professional advocacy and critical pedagogy.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Economics
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#1 No Poverty

Source: InCites

Logo image