Logo image
The relationship between predicted disability support costs and the assessment methodology used: A comparison of three tools for people with intellectual disabilities
Abstract   Peer reviewed

The relationship between predicted disability support costs and the assessment methodology used: A comparison of three tools for people with intellectual disabilities

Jonathan Mason and Kate Crowson
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol.60(7-8), p.797
International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Development Disabilities (IASSIDD) World Congress, 15th (Melbourne, Australia, 15-Aug-2016–19-Aug-2016)
2016
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12306View
Published Version

Abstract

Education Medical and Health Sciences Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Aim: The introduction of the National DisabilityInsurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia will mergecurrent approaches to funding allocation into a moreconsistent and equitable method based on individualsupport needs. This project sought to determine apractical and validated methodology for assessingsupport needs in people with intellectual disabilities(ID) by examining which measures best fulfil NDISrequirements, how each measure predicts support need,and which are most user-friendly. Method: 30individuals (22 males, 8 females) in Queensland,Australia completed three existing measures of supportneed, including the Inventory for Client and AgencyPlanning (ICAP), the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS)and the Instrument for the Classification andAssessment of Support Needs (ICAN). Results: Datawill summarise the findings, including an analysis of how eachmeasure shows different predictions for primary support needs,and how these difference s may affect the nature and degree offunding allocated under the forthcoming NDIS. Conclusions:A parsimonious assessment process for people with ID requiringfunding under the NDIS will be presented.

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
393 Record Views
Logo image