Abstract
Peer mentoring : models and outcomes at QUT
Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference: Changing Climates: Education for Sustainable Futures, 2008 (Brisbane, Australia, 30-Nov-2008–04-Dec-2008)
2008
Abstract
Students entering university study often experience feelings of isolation and disconnection, both academically and socially. At Queensland University of Technology, like many universities, there is a commitment to the student experience, in relation to welfare, satisfaction, retention, and success. The first year experience is a priority for many universities. Kift and Nelson (2005) described the unique needs of students-in-transition: social, academic, and administrative support. Efforts to facilitate the transition to university for first-year students include transition programs targeted for specific faculties' requirements (McInnis et al., 2000); academically oriented peer support programs (McInnis et al., 2000); reciprocal peer tutoring (Rittschof & Griffin, 2001); online support (O'Reagan et al., 2004); and mentoring programs (Drew et al., 2000). Peer mentors may be a valuable resource for institutions to use in increasing persistence rates and enhancing the first year experience (Kahn & Nauta, 2001). Some of the benefits for first-year students include preventing the negative effects of stress (Jacobi, 1991, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); enhancing the sense of belonging and identity with the university, school or faculty (Evans & Peel, 1999, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); early access to information about resources on campus (Clark & Crome, 2004, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); academic success (Rodger & Tremblay, 2003, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); social connections (Pope & Van Dyke, 1999, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); skill development (Treston, 1999, cited in Glaser et al., 2006); and improved retention (Jacobi, 1991, cited in Glaser et al., 2006). In implementing a mentoring program, research indicates several factors critical to the success of the mentoring relationship including: organisational support; clarifying goals and roles; matching mentor and mentees; training mentors; sufficient resources; and monitoring and evaluation (Lloyd & Bristol, 2006). The structure of mentoring programs may vary depending on the target faculty or discipline. Key characteristics associated with effective programs, correspond with characteristics that are critical to the success of mentoring programs. These include: the characteristics of the mentor; the size of the mentoring group; the sustainability of the program; the presence of a coordinator; ongoing monitoring and evaluation; and a multidimensional approach (Rolfe-Flett, 2000).
Details
- Title
- Peer mentoring : models and outcomes at QUT
- Authors
- Ann M Heirdsfield (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologyKaren J Nelson (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologyBruce Tills (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologyTimothy Cheeseman (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologyKate Derrington (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologySue Walker (Author) - Queensland University of TechnologyKerryann Walsh (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
- Conference details
- Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference: Changing Climates: Education for Sustainable Futures, 2008 (Brisbane, Australia, 30-Nov-2008–04-Dec-2008)
- Publisher
- Australian Association for Research in Education
- Date published
- 2008
- Copyright note
- Copyright © 2008 The Authors. Reproduced here with permission of the publisher.
- Organisation Unit
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; Office of the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Students)
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99448784802621
- Output Type
- Abstract
Metrics
84 File views/ downloads
1516 Record Views