Logo image
Mercury Disclosure Practices of Major Emitting Companies: A Qualitative Analysis
Abstract   Open access   Peer reviewed

Mercury Disclosure Practices of Major Emitting Companies: A Qualitative Analysis

Md Hafij Ullah, James Hazelton and Peter Nelson
14th Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference Book of Abstracts, pp.30-31
Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference (A-CSEAR), 14th (Sydney, Australia, 10-Dec-2015–11-Dec-2015)
2015
pdf
PDF - Presentation362.35 kBDownloadView
PresentationPDF - Presentation Open Access
pdf
PDF - Published Version92.11 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Dr_James_Hazelton_and_Dr_John_Dumay_A_CSEAR_2015_P?id=1BhsCwAAQBAJView
Webpage

Abstract

Banking, Finance and Investment mercury disclosure companies annual report and qualitative content analysis
Mercury is one of the world's most toxic elements. Corporate mercury reporting in Pollution Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) is compulsory in some countries but disclosure in companies' annual or sustainability reports is not mandatory. Therefore, mercury disclosure in these reports differs among the companies. This paper aims to identify the current quality of corporate mercury reporting and propose best practice mercury disclosure by analyzing the current disclosure practices of the largest mercury emitting companies.Major corporate mercury emitters were identified from Pollution Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) of the USA, Australia, Canada, the UK and the EU. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify and analyse the contents of 2013 mercury disclosures in the annual report, sustainability report, environmental performance report, or company website. Few companies disclosed mercury information. For disclosing companies the volume and dimensions of mercury disclosure significantly differed. Major dimensions of mercury disclosures include: extent of mercury emissions, sources of emissions, variation in emissions and its reasons, health safety and mercury impacts, mercury control, technologies for mercury reduction, mercury monitoring, and management. Companies from the USA and Australia disclosed more mercury information than companies from other countries. Policy implications Guidelines are proposed to assist regulators regarding policy development and enable mercury emitting companies to benchmark their mercury reporting practices. Researchers in social and environmental accounting may use the issues raised in this article for more comprehensive studies in mercury disclosure practices.Though there are many studies on mercury from scientific, physiological or environmental perspectives no studies have been conducted focusing on mercury accounting or disclosure or social and environmental accounting perspective.

Details

Metrics

46 File views/ downloads
353 Record Views
Logo image