Logo image
Differences in drivers' perception and interactions with boom-controlled rail level crossings in urban versus rural environments
Abstract   Peer reviewed

Differences in drivers' perception and interactions with boom-controlled rail level crossings in urban versus rural environments

Vanessa Beanland, Paul M Salmon, Kristie Young, A Filtness, Gemma J M Read, M Lenné and Neville A Stanton
Proceedings of the 2016 Australasian Road Safety Conference
Australasian Road Safety Conference, 2016 (Canberra, Australia, 06-Sep-2016–08-Sep-2016)
2016
url
http://acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2016/Beanland%2000175%20EA.pdfView
Webpage

Abstract

Transportation and Freight Services
Efforts to improve rail level crossing (RLX) safety are hampered in part by the sheer number of RLXs; approximately 10,500 in Australia, with diverse characteristics. The plethora of RLX environments means a single standard RLX design may not be appropriate, since the same infrastructure could generate distinct interactions depending on its surrounding context. Using instrumented vehicles, we compared drivers' perceptions and interactions with boom-controlled active RLXs in two vastly different on-road environments: urban and rural. Results suggest that although urban RLX environments are more complex and demanding, drivers in rural areas are more likely to perceive RLXs as hazardous.

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
705 Record Views
Logo image