Logo image
Development of an Athlete Diet Index for Rapid Dietary Assessment of Athletes
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Development of an Athlete Diet Index for Rapid Dietary Assessment of Athletes

Louise Capling, Janelle A Gifford, Kathryn L Beck, Victoria M Flood, Gary J Slater, Gareth S Denyer and Helen T O'Connor
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, Vol.29(6), pp.643-650
2019
PMID: 31629350
url
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2019-0098View
Published Version

Abstract

energy intake diet quality sports nutrition
Food-based diet indices provide a practical, rapid and inexpensive way of evaluating dietary intake. Rather than nutrients, diet indices assess intake of whole foods and dietary patterns, and compare these to nutrition guidelines. An athlete-specific diet index would offer an efficient and practical way to assess the quality of athletes' diets, guide nutrition interventions and focus sport nutrition support. This study describes the development and validation of an Athlete Diet Index (ADI). Item development was informed by a review of existing diet indices, relevant literature and in-depth focus groups with 20 sports nutritionists (median 11 years' professional experience) from four elite athlete sporting institutes. Focus group data were analyzed (NVivo 11 Pro) and key themes identified to guide development of athlete-relevant items. A modified Delphi survey in a sub-group of sports nutritionists (n=9) supported item content validation. Pilot testing with athletes (n=15) subsequently informed face validity. The final ADI (n=68 items) was categorized into three sections. Section A (n=45 items) evaluated usual intake; special diets or intolerances; dietary habits and culinary skills. Section B (n=15 items) assessed training load; nutrition supporting training; and sports supplement use. Section C (n=8 items) captured demographic details; sporting type and calibre. All athletes reported the ADI as 'easy' (40%) or 'very easy' (60% of participants) to use, and rated the tool as 'relevant' (37%) or 'very relevant' (63% of participants) to athletes. Further evaluation of the ADI, including the development of a scoring matrix and validation compared to established dietary methodology, is warranted.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Sport Sciences
Logo image