Logo image
Back
Literature review: Do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Literature review: Do rapid response systems reduce the incidence of major adverse events in the deteriorating ward patient?

Deborah Massey, L M Aitken and W Chaboyer
Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol.19(23-24), pp.3260-3273
2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.x
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03394.xView
Published Version

Abstract

critical care outreach teams integrative review Medical Emergency Teams rapid response systems thedeteriorating patient
Aims: To conduct a literature review that explores the impact of rapid response systems on reducing major adverse events experienced by deteriorating ward patients. Background: Patients located on hospitals wards are frequently older, have multiple co-morbidities and are often at risk of life-threatening clinical deterioration. Rapid response systems have been developed and implemented to provide appropriate and timely intervention to these patients. Design: A comprehensive review of the literature. Methods: This review used the rapid response systems framework recently developed by experts in the area. Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1995-June 2009. Sixteen papers were selected that most clearly reflected the research aim. Each paper was critically appraised and systematically assessed. Major themes and findings were identified for each of the studies. Results: The effectiveness of rapid response systems in reducing major adverse events in deteriorating ward patients remains inconclusive. Six studies demonstrated that the introduction of a rapid response systems positively impacted on patient outcomes, but three studies demonstrated no positive impact on patient outcomes. Nursing staff appear reluctant to use rapid response systems; the rationale for this is unclear. However, the continued underuse and inactivation may be one reason why research findings evaluating rapid response systems have been inconclusive. Conclusions: The paper illustrates two important gaps in the literature. First, 'ramp-up' systems have not been subjected to formal evaluation. Second, rapid response systems are under-activated and underused by nursing staff. There is an urgent need to explore the reasons for this and to identify interventions to improve the activation of these systems in an effort to promote safe and effective care to the deteriorating ward patient. Relevance to clinical practice: Rapid response systems are multidimensional models. They are relatively new innovations that have important implications for clinical research and implementation policy. This review contributes to the emerging debate on rapid response systems. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Details

Metrics

379 Record Views
34 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Nursing

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image