Logo image
Structural factors influencing conservation decision-making: a case of species prioritisation in Australia
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Structural factors influencing conservation decision-making: a case of species prioritisation in Australia

Milena Kiatkoski Kim, Louisa Evans, Pedro Fidelman, Lea M Scherl and Helene Marsh
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol.60(11), pp.1923-1943
2017
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1268107View
Published Version

Abstract

prioritisation social structures policy instruments conservation planning uptake
Prioritisation methods have been adopted for >20 years to inform resource allocation in species conservation. The academic literature on prioritisation focuses on technical matters, with little attention to the socio-political factors affecting the uptake of priorities. We investigated the policy instruments employed to promote uptake, and the structural factors affecting the uptake of priorities, using as our case study a species prioritisation method adopted by the Queensland Government (Australia). We interviewed 79 key informants and analysed policy documents and plans. The Queensland Government relied on 'information delivery' as a policy instrument to foster uptake. We identified communication channels to assist 'information delivery' between Government and intended users, but also found that several structural factors limited their use: fragmentation of policies, the relative strength of alternative priorities and centralisation of power in decision-making. We discuss the results in relation to other conservation planning initiatives and suggest how structural barriers can be addressed.

Details

Metrics

6 File views/ downloads
580 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Development Studies
Regional & Urban Planning

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image