${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Classification of marine bioregions on the east coast of South Africa Wed 27 Feb 2019 09:38:43 AEST ]]> Marine reserves and seascape context shape fish assemblages in seagrass ecosystems Wed 14 Mar 2018 12:37:41 AEST ]]> Participatory development of a new interactive tool for capturing social and ecological dynamism in conservation prioritization Tue 21 Jul 2015 11:35:40 AEST ]]> Conservation benefits of marine reserves are undiminished near coastal rivers and cities Tue 16 Jul 2019 13:22:49 AEST ]]> High-resolution seabed imagery as a tool for biodiversity conservation planning on continental margins Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:41:13 AEST ]]> Limited habitat and conservation value of a young artificial reef Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:41:05 AEST ]]> Effective protection of fish on inshore coral reefs depends on the scale of mangrove-reef connectivity Tue 14 Jun 2016 11:53:46 AEST ]]> Habitat connectivity improves reserve performance Tue 14 Jun 2016 11:53:42 AEST ]]> Managing birds of conservation concern on sandy shores: How much room for future conservation actions is there? Tue 04 Dec 2018 09:39:40 AEST ]]> GIS as a Rapid Decision-support Tool for Raptor Conservation Planning in Urbanising Landscapes Thu 27 Jun 2019 12:59:35 AEST ]]> Quantifying the conservation value of seascape connectivity: a global synthesis Thu 22 Dec 2016 08:12:45 AEST ]]> Integrating ecosystem services supply potential in protected area management: A Bangladesh study Thu 20 Jun 2019 16:09:23 AEST ]]> Can distribution models help refine inventory-based estimates of conservation priority? A case study in the Eastern Arc forests of Tanzania and Kenya Thu 14 Feb 2019 12:49:05 AEST ]]> Tropical moist forests Thu 14 Feb 2019 12:48:49 AEST ]]> Prioritising seascape connectivity in conservation using network analysis Mon 30 Oct 2017 12:52:52 AEST ]]> Structural factors influencing conservation decision-making: a case of species prioritisation in Australia 20 years to inform resource allocation in species conservation. The academic literature on prioritisation focuses on technical matters, with little attention to the socio-political factors affecting the uptake of priorities. We investigated the policy instruments employed to promote uptake, and the structural factors affecting the uptake of priorities, using as our case study a species prioritisation method adopted by the Queensland Government (Australia). We interviewed 79 key informants and analysed policy documents and plans. The Queensland Government relied on ‘information delivery’ as a policy instrument to foster uptake. We identified communication channels to assist ‘information delivery’ between Government and intended users, but also found that several structural factors limited their use: fragmentation of policies, the relative strength of alternative priorities and centralisation of power in decision-making. We discuss the results in relation to other conservation planning initiatives and suggest how structural barriers can be addressed.]]> Fri 14 Jun 2019 09:53:24 AEST ]]> Conservation benefits of marine reserves are undiminished near coastal rivers and cities Fri 11 Nov 2016 16:44:33 AEST ]]> Beyond climate change attribution in conservation and ecological research Fri 08 Sep 2017 14:26:11 AEST ]]>