Logo image
A Comparison of Impact of Management on Local Government Employee Outcomes in US and Australia
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A Comparison of Impact of Management on Local Government Employee Outcomes in US and Australia

Yvonne Brunetto, Stephen Teo, Rodney Farr-Wharton, Dennis Lambries, Patrick Gillett and William Tomes
Local Government Studies, Vol.41(4), pp.485-515
2015
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.968707View
Published Version

Abstract

supervision management practices Australia United States new public management
This paper compares the impact of management practices on employee's perception of resource adequacy and in turn engagement of local government employees in Australia and the USA. A survey design was used involving 250 local government employees working in Australia and 265 working in the USA. The overall findings identify significant paths from management practice, through to resource adequacy and in turn, employee engagement. Additionally, the findings identify a significant difference in perceptions of the work environment for US local government employees compared with those in Australia. In particular, employees in the US perceive a significantly higher level of satisfaction with management (both perceived organisational support and leader-member exchange), perceive significantly lower levels of resource inadequacy and are much more engaged than their local government counterparts in Australia. The implications are that the way management is conceptualised and practised in Australian local government is negatively impacting on employee engagement and therefore must change.

Details

Metrics

18 File views/ downloads
1977 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Political Science
Public Administration
Regional & Urban Planning
Logo image